<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Raptr Blog &#187; Ponderings</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.raptr.com/category/ponderings/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.raptr.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 19:09:20 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Most Played XBLA Games of Q3 2009</title>
		<link>http://blog.raptr.com/2009/08/19/most-played-xbla-games-of-q3-2009/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.raptr.com/2009/08/19/most-played-xbla-games-of-q3-2009/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Aug 2009 17:19:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Allen Wang</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Ponderings]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.raptr.com/?p=793</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Q3 has been an interesting quarter. There hasn&#8217;t really been any blockbuster titles (with the exception of Madden 10) so we&#8217;ve been playing what we got and XBLA games. I already wrote on the most played 360 games in the past year so now I&#8217;m focusing on our favorite console network, XBLA. These are the [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Q3 has been an interesting quarter. There hasn&#8217;t really been any blockbuster titles (with the exception of <a href="http://raptr.com/game/360/Madden_NFL_10" target="_blank">Madden 10</a>) so we&#8217;ve been playing what we got and XBLA games. I already wrote on the <a href="http://blog.raptr.com/2009/08/06/top-11-most-played-xbox-360-games/" target="_blank">most played</a> 360 games in the past year so now I&#8217;m focusing on our favorite console network, XBLA. These are the top 8 played XBLA games per gamer in Q3 so far.</p>
<h3>8.<a href="http://raptr.com/game/XBLA/Teenage_Mutant_Ninja_Turtles_Turtles_in_Time_Re-Shelled"><img class="alignnone" title="TMNT: Turtles in Time Re-Shelled" src="http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2656/3835292354_8b249757cf.jpg" alt="" width="200" height="274" /></a><br />
<a href="http://raptr.com/game/XBLA/Teenage_Mutant_Ninja_Turtles_Turtles_in_Time_Re-Shelled" target="_blank">TMNT: Turtles in Time Re-Shelled</a> &#8211; 1.2 hours per player</h3>
<p>This classic pretty much only takes 1 hour to beat with a good team. Just like the original &#8211; without the quarters.<span id="more-793"></span></p>
<h3>7.<a href="http://raptr.com/game/XBLA/Splosion_Man"><img class="alignnone" title="Splosion Man" src="http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3466/3834500315_b60626a7b6.jpg" alt="" width="200" height="274" /></a><br />
<a href="http://raptr.com/game/XBLA/Splosion_Man" target="_blank">&#8216;Splosion Man</a> &#8211; 3.0 hours per player</h3>
<p>Blow stuff up. Fun for everyone and apparently enough fun for 3 hours.</p>
<h3>6.<a href="http://raptr.com/game/360/The_Secret_of_Monkey_Island_Special_Edition"><img class="alignnone" title="Monkey Island" src="http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3575/3834499887_4f19d6d2e1.jpg" alt="" width="200" height="274" /></a><br />
<a href="http://raptr.com/game/360/The_Secret_of_Monkey_Island_Special_Edition" target="_blank">The Secret of Monkey Island</a> &#8211; 3.3 hours per player</h3>
<p>3.3 hours per player. That could mean one of  two things &#8211; either you played the original and remembered where everything was, or you played it for 3 hours and then gave up.</p>
<h3>5.<a href="http://raptr.com/game/XBLA/Trials_HD"><img class="alignnone" title="Trials HD" src="http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2441/3834500191_ea16e3db9b.jpg" alt="" width="200" height="274" /></a><br />
<a href="http://raptr.com/game/XBLA/Trials_HD" target="_blank">Trials HD</a> &#8211; 3.6 hours per player</h3>
<p>Racing! Lots of levels! User generated content! This game has only been out a few days and it makes the list &#8211; chances are it&#8217;ll get higher in the coming days.</p>
<h3>4.<a href="http://raptr.com/game/360/Worms_2_Armageddon"><img class="alignnone" title="Worms 2" src="http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2640/3834500337_0633e12249.jpg" alt="" width="200" height="274" /></a><br />
<a href="http://raptr.com/game/360/Worms_2_Armageddon" target="_blank">Worms 2: Armageddon</a> &#8211; 4.1 hours per player</h3>
<p>Another classic. Everyone likes to kill worms with weapons from dynamite to exploding super sheep. Fun and competitive multiplayer keeps this one on the list.</p>
<h3>3.<a href="http://raptr.com/game/XBLA/Marvel_vs._Capcom_2"><img class="alignnone" title="Marvel Vs. Capcom 2" src="http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3604/3834507201_871e7a71f3.jpg" alt="" width="200" height="274" /></a><br />
<a href="http://raptr.com/game/XBLA/Marvel_vs._Capcom_2" target="_blank">Marvel Vs. Capcom 2</a> &#8211; 4.2 hours per player</h3>
<p>This remake runs flawlessly and holds true to the original. Replay-ability comes with the multiplayer.</p>
<h3>2.<a href="http://raptr.com/game/XBLA/Magic_The_Gathering_Duels_of_the_Planeswalkers"><img class="alignnone" title="Magic The Gathering" src="http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2479/3835292252_8a594626e5.jpg" alt="" width="200" height="274" /></a><br />
<a href="http://raptr.com/game/XBLA/Magic_The_Gathering_Duels_of_the_Planeswalkers" target="_blank">Magic the Gathering: Duel of the Planeswalkers</a> &#8211; 7.0 hours per player</h3>
<p>Slightly surprising to see this game up here. I guess because the gameplay is simple and keeps true to the original. Also, players want to unlock all the cards in each deck.</p>
<h3>1.<a href="http://raptr.com/game/XBLA/Battlefield_1943"><img class="alignnone" title="Battlefield 1943" src="http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3422/3835292224_2ef03d6ceb.jpg" alt="" width="200" height="274" /></a><br />
<a href="http://raptr.com/game/XBLA/Battlefield_1943" target="_blank">Battlefield 1943</a> &#8211; 8.8 hours per player</h3>
<p>This one is not surprising. Battlefield on the 360 for cheap? That&#8217;s a winner right there.</p>
<p>That&#8217;s it for the list. Help contribute to the numbers by signing up for <a href="http://raptr.com" target="_blank">Raptr</a>!</p>
<p><a class="retweet vert" href="http://blog.raptr.com/2009/08/19/most-played-xbla-games-of-q3-2009/" target="_blank">RT @Raptr Most Played XBLA Games of Q3 2009</a> <script src="http://digg.com/tools/diggthis.js" type="text/javascript"></script></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.raptr.com/2009/08/19/most-played-xbla-games-of-q3-2009/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Top 11 Most Played Xbox 360 Games</title>
		<link>http://blog.raptr.com/2009/08/06/top-11-most-played-xbox-360-games/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.raptr.com/2009/08/06/top-11-most-played-xbox-360-games/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Aug 2009 20:01:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Allen Wang</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Ponderings]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.raptr.com/?p=612</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Ever wondered how long a gamer plays Halo 3 or Gears of War 2 on average? You may be surprised by the results. 
A few things before I get started: The games are listed in reverse order by playtime. I chose games that have been out for more than 6 months because newer games obviously [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ever wondered how long a gamer plays Halo 3 or Gears of War 2 on average? <strong>You may be surprised by the results. </strong></p>
<p><span style="color: #0000ff;">A few things before I get started: The games are listed in reverse order by playtime. I chose games that have been out for more than 6 months because newer games obviously won&#8217;t have as many hours. I also added possible explanations to why the hours are the way they are for the &#8216;OMGWTFBBQ WHY DOES HALO 3 HAVE SO LITTLE HOURS&#8217; comments. Important note: this data is taken from the past <em>year</em> &#8211; so these are the top games from now to about the same time last year. </span></p>
<h2><strong>11.</strong><a href="http://raptr.com/game/360/Grand_Theft_Auto_IV?src=topgames_discover"><img class="alignnone" title="Grand Theft Auto 4" src="http://a5.raptr.com/games/6e6/3f6/6e63f6e129aeff9df62cb437fb980f3e/images/large/boxart.jpg" alt="" width="144" height="144" /></a></h2>
<h3><a href="http://raptr.com/game/360/Grand_Theft_Auto_IV?src=topgames_discover" target="_blank">Grand Theft Auto 4</a> &#8211; 10.1 Hours per player</h3>
<p>First on the list is Grand Theft Auto 4. So it looks like people only play GTA4 for about 10 hours &#8211; that&#8217;s understandable. GTA4, IMO, is one of those games everyone tries, then gets bored of it quickly. Sure, there&#8217;s a bunch of DLC and replay content, but the &#8220;try-it-and-sell-it&#8221; crowd drag the average hours down.<span id="more-612"></span></p>
<h2>10.    <a href="http://raptr.com/game/360/Street_Fighter_IV?qt=game&amp;qi=2"><img class="alignnone" title="Street Fighter 4" src="http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2589/3793992508_dafb122c0c.jpg" alt="" width="101" height="144" /></a></h2>
<h3><a href="http://raptr.com/game/360/Street_Fighter_IV?qt=game&amp;qi=2" target="_blank">Street Fighter 4</a> &#8211; 11.4 Hours per player</h3>
<p>I can see why this game is on the list. Other fighting games don&#8217;t reach this high, but if I had to guess the reason (I always am taking guesses), I&#8217;d say it&#8217;s because of the competition factor &#8211; Street Fighter 4 has some intense competitions. If you looked at other popular fighting games such as <a href="http://raptr.com/game/360/Soulcalibur_IV" target="_blank">Soul Calibur 4</a>, you&#8217;d see that a lot of people own it, but lack of competitive play hurt it.</p>
<h2>9.      <a href="http://raptr.com/game/360/Resident_Evil_5"><img class="alignnone" title="Resident Evil 5" src="http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2443/3796062304_0614068320_m.jpg" alt="" width="101" height="144" /></a></h2>
<h3><a href="http://raptr.com/game/360/Resident_Evil_5" target="_blank">Resident Evil 5</a> &#8211; 13.1 Hours per player</h3>
<p>Resident Evil 5 is a strange one. It only has one story mode and zero multiplayer, yet it makes it relatively high on the list. I think it&#8217;s because anybody who plays Resident Evil 5, finishes it. Unlike those other games where you can play a few hours of multiplayer, Resident Evil 5 makes  you want to finish the game. Also, the Co-op feature is pretty fun and allows for at least one more play through with a different friend.</p>
<h2>8.      <a href="http://raptr.com/game/360/Left_4_Dead?src=sg&amp;index=17"><img class="alignnone" title="Left 4 Dead" src="http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3437/3796062484_150f6ec91b_m.jpg" alt="" width="101" height="144" /></a></h2>
<h3><a href="http://raptr.com/game/360/Left_4_Dead?src=sg&amp;index=17" target="_blank">Left 4 Dead</a> &#8211; 16.4 Hours per player</h3>
<p>Who doesn&#8217;t like hordes of zombies? Left 4 Dead keeps players through two modes: Versus and co-op survival levels. 8th most played is good, but I think it&#8217;s not higher is because survival can get a bit repetitive and you either love or hate versus.</p>
<h2>7.  <a href="http://raptr.com/game/360/Call_of_Duty_4_Modern_Warfare"><img class="alignnone" title="Call of Duty 4" src="http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3581/3796062518_eff623720f_m.jpg" alt="" width="144" height="144" /></a></h2>
<h3><a href="http://raptr.com/game/360/Call_of_Duty_4_Modern_Warfare" target="_blank">Call of Duty 4: Modern Warfare</a> &#8211; 17.3 Hours per player</h3>
<p>Call of Duty 4 is one of those &#8220;lots-of-people-have-it-but-some-stop-playing-it-and-others-play-it-hardcore&#8221; games. Most people who play it enjoy it, but it takes a certain player to take it to the next level; some move onto the next game, some play the heck out of it.</p>
<h2>6.      <a href="http://raptr.com/game/360/Fable_II?src=sg&amp;index=10"><img class="alignnone" title="Fable 2" src="http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2427/3796062570_1220573b47_m.jpg" alt="" width="101" height="144" /></a></h2>
<h3><a href="http://raptr.com/game/360/Fable_II?src=sg&amp;index=10" target="_blank">Fable 2</a> &#8211; 18.0 Hours per player</h3>
<p>This was unexpected to me. Fable 2 is a decent game, but not widely well reviewed like many of the others on the list. Despite that, I have a few theories. People leave Fable 2 on to farm gold &#8211; even I&#8217;ve done it. DLC also plays a big part as well as replay-ability to try the other side (evil vs. good).</p>
<h2>5.      <a href="http://raptr.com/game/360/Halo_3"><img class="alignnone" title="Halo 3" src="http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2533/3796062996_ab11aecb3b_m.jpg" alt="" width="101" height="144" /></a></h2>
<h3><a href="http://raptr.com/game/360/Halo_3" target="_blank">Halo 3</a> &#8211; 22.0 Hours per player</h3>
<p>OMGWTFBBQ WHY DOES HALO 3 HAVE SO LITTLE HOURS. Once again, it&#8217;s a &#8220;lots-of-people-have-it-but-some-stop-playing-it-and-others-play-it-hardcore&#8221; game. One of the reasons I think it does better than Call of Duty 4 is because of the competition factor &#8211; with MLG and other brakets, Halo 3 is played a lot.</p>
<h2>4.      <a href="http://raptr.com/game/360/Rock_Band_2?src=sg&amp;index=1"><img class="alignnone" title="Rock Band 2" src="http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2596/3796063296_f8326d326b_m.jpg" alt="" width="101" height="144" /></a></h2>
<h3><a href="http://raptr.com/game/360/Rock_Band_2?src=sg&amp;index=1" target="_blank">Rock Band 2</a> &#8211; 26.6 Hours per player</h3>
<p>Who doesn&#8217;t like party games? Rock Band 2 is great for parties and it shows. The best part about Rock Band 2 is that you can play it with a seemingly limitless combination of friends. Also, if you&#8217;re going to pay $200 for a game, you better play it a lot.</p>
<h2>3.      <a href="http://raptr.com/game/360/Gears_of_War_2"><img class="alignnone" title="Gears of War 2" src="http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3465/3795242929_72a6e29d11_m.jpg" alt="" width="101" height="144" /></a></h2>
<h3><a href="http://raptr.com/game/360/Gears_of_War_2" target="_blank">Gears of War 2</a> &#8211; 28.2 Hours per player</h3>
<p>Gears of War 2 gets number 3. I think it&#8217;s because of the following reasons: Horde mode &#8211; nothing gets more hours than a group of 5 surviving waves and waves of baddies. Less universal than Halo 3 &#8211; people who buy Gears of War 2 most likely played Gears of War 1. In contrast, I know many people who got 360s just for Halo 3 even though they didn&#8217;t play the previous ones. Bundles &#8211; Gears of War 2 was never bundled while Halo 3 was bundled with special editions and elites. DLC &#8211; Gears of War 2 has had several DLCs which have kept the fans coming back for more.</p>
<h2>2.      <a href="http://raptr.com/game/360/Fallout_3?qt=game&amp;qi=10"><img class="alignnone" title="Fallout 3" src="http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3422/3796063366_1df515d747_m.jpg" alt="" width="101" height="144" /></a></h2>
<h3><a href="http://raptr.com/game/360/Fallout_3?qt=game&amp;qi=10" target="_blank">Fallout 3</a> &#8211; 31.2 Hours per player</h3>
<p>Fallout 3&#8230; the only pure single player game on the list. This one is easy (I think) to explain: DLC and replay-ability. Fallout 3 has had several content packs that have added substantial value to the game. Also, with the variety of how you can build your character, most players go back for a second play through.</p>
<h2>1.      <a href="http://raptr.com/game/360/Call_of_Duty_World_at_War"><img class="alignnone" title="Call of Duty: World at War" src="http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3508/3796063464_df583c1398_m.jpg" alt="" width="101" height="144" /></a></h2>
<h3><a href="http://raptr.com/game/360/Call_of_Duty_World_at_War" target="_blank">Call of Duty: World at War</a> &#8211; 37.7 Hours per player</h3>
<p>What? Call of Duty: World at War at number 1? At first it was a shocker to me, but after thinking about it, it&#8217;s not. World at War has had many downloadable map packs that not only add more levels to the game, but also more play styles. Also, similar to Gears of War 2, the game has a more &#8220;pure&#8221; audience. It looks like most World at War players enjoyed it and kept playing.  </p>
<p>Well, that&#8217;s the list. Feel free to add different explanations to why some numbers are the way they are. I&#8217;ve played all of these games in one form or another, but some of your hardcore players may have more information than I. If you haven&#8217;t already, sign up for <a href="http://raptr.com">Raptr</a> to automatically track your gameplay!<br />
<a class="retweet vert" href="http://blog.raptr.com/2009/08/06/top-11-most-played-xbox-360-games/" target="_blank" align="left">RT @Raptr Top 11 Most Played Xbox 360 Games</a> <script src="http://digg.com/tools/diggthis.js" type="text/javascript" align="left"></script></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.raptr.com/2009/08/06/top-11-most-played-xbox-360-games/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>18</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>What Makes A Game Successful?</title>
		<link>http://blog.raptr.com/2009/07/31/what-makes-a-game-successful/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.raptr.com/2009/07/31/what-makes-a-game-successful/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 31 Jul 2009 20:02:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Allen Wang</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Ponderings]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.raptr.com/?p=568</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Working at Raptr, I see video games come and go. I see games get hyped up, explode, then disappear &#8211; however, once in a while I see a game stay. So it got me thinking, what makes people keep coming back? Does a developer/publisher strive to make sales or provide replayability? Here&#8217;s what I looked [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Working at <a href="http://raptr.com/">Raptr</a>, I see video games come and go. I see games get hyped up, explode, then disappear &#8211; however, once in a while I see a game stay. So it got me thinking, what makes people keep coming back? Does a developer/publisher strive to make sales or provide replayability? Here&#8217;s what I looked at. <span style="color: #ff0000;">Disclaimer</span>: I am not a professional research analyst, just a Community Manager and gamer that watches trends.</p>
<p>So the game that brought about my sudden inner analyst was <em><a href="http://raptr.com/game/XBLA/Battlefield_1943?qt=game&amp;qi=0" target="_blank">Battlefield 1943</a></em>. I read all over the place about <em>Battlefield 1943</em> shattering records and causing server crashes. I let a few weeks pass, and this is what I saw:</p>
<p><a href="http://raptr.com/game/XBLA/Battlefield_1943?qt=game&amp;qi=0"><img class="alignnone" title="Battlefield 1943" src="http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3578/3772809665_54696ee588.jpg" alt="" width="493" height="335" /></a></p>
<p style="text-align: center;">&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;-</p>
<p>Looks like some people are still playing it, but it is no where near it&#8217;s server crashing status. Looks like people have gotten a little bored of it. So I looked at other XBLA games. Next stop, <em><a href="http://raptr.com/game/360/The_Secret_of_Monkey_Island_Special_Edition_?qt=game&amp;qi=5" target="_blank">Monkey Island</a></em>:<span id="more-568"></span></p>
<p><a href="http://raptr.com/game/360/The_Secret_of_Monkey_Island_Special_Edition_?qt=game&amp;qi=5"><img class="alignnone" title="Monkey Island" src="http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2421/3773589958_0279c47a8a.jpg" alt="" width="495" height="361" /></a></p>
<p style="text-align: center;">&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;-</p>
<p>I seriously doubt all those people beat it within the first few days. Not surprised at these results &#8211; adventure games were never about their replayability. Maybe the issue is that <em>Monkey Island</em> is a single-player game, and most of the high performers are multi-player. I turn towards one of the most popular single-player games out right now: <em><a href="http://raptr.com/game/360/Fallout_3?qt=game&amp;qi=10" target="_blank">Fallout 3</a></em>.</p>
<p><a href="http://raptr.com/game/360/Fallout_3?qt=game&amp;qi=10"><img class="alignnone" title="Fallout 3" src="http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3428/3773590110_84cfc1fa32.jpg" alt="" width="495" height="334" /></a></p>
<p style="text-align: center;">&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;-</p>
<p>Like all the others, it has had a spike and decline, but since then it&#8217;s stayed relatively steady. It looks like it was making a comeback the last few months. Around those small peaks were DLC releases &#8211; <a href="http://raptr.com/game/360/Fallout_3_Mothership_Zeta?qt=game&amp;qi=3" target="_blank"><em>Mothership Zeta</em></a> will probably produce a similar peak. So DLCs must change something about playtime. I look towards a game that recently has had a DLC &#8211; <em><a href="http://raptr.com/game/360/Gears_of_War_2" target="_blank">Gears of War 2</a></em>:</p>
<p><a href="http://raptr.com/game/360/Gears_of_War_2"><img class="alignnone" title="Gears of War 2" src="http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2461/3772782965_b1daca359c.jpg" alt="" width="495" height="335" /></a></p>
<p style="text-align: center;">&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;-</p>
<p>DLC does cause a big jump in gametime. Of course DLC would produce those results; in a way, it&#8217;s like a tiny expansion to the game. What about a game that doesn&#8217;t have any DLC? I look for a game that performs relatively well without any DLC &#8211; <a href="http://raptr.com/game/360/Street_Fighter_IV?qt=game&amp;qi=4" target="_blank"><em>Street Fighter IV</em></a>:</p>
<p><a href="http://raptr.com/game/360/Street_Fighter_IV?qt=game&amp;qi=4"><img class="alignnone" title="Street Fighter 4" src="http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3514/3773590036_d3dacc8a33.jpg" alt="" width="496" height="336" /></a></p>
<p style="text-align: center;">&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;-</p>
<p>No DLC here and it still performs relatively well. Despite that, there is still that peak and decline in gameplay. My search sends me to go look for a game with consistently high gameplay. After some searching, I came across my old friend <a href="http://raptr.com/game/360/Left_4_Dead?src=sg&amp;index=2" target="_blank"><em>Left 4 Dead</em></a>:</p>
<p><a href="http://raptr.com/game/360/Left_4_Dead?src=sg&amp;index=2"><img class="alignnone" title="Left 4 Dead" src="http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3436/3773590068_26573a2a6d.jpg" alt="" width="495" height="336" /></a></p>
<p style="text-align: center;">&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;-</p>
<p>Looking at the chart, gameplay seems relatively consistent. <em>Left 4 Dead</em> had a good launch and plenty of updates &#8211; include user mods and the game does well.</p>
<p>So what have I decided? As I said before, I&#8217;m not a professional research analyst, so here&#8217;s my answer: I don&#8217;t really know. Create a fun game with continued support and user customization, and you will have something great.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.raptr.com/2009/07/31/what-makes-a-game-successful/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Why You Should Keep Your Strategy Guides</title>
		<link>http://blog.raptr.com/2009/07/13/why-you-should-keep-your-strategy-guides/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.raptr.com/2009/07/13/why-you-should-keep-your-strategy-guides/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Jul 2009 23:28:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Allen Wang</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Ponderings]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.raptr.com/?p=448</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I recently bought Tales of Vesperia for the 360 and wanted to buy a strategy guide. I generally like to get the strategy guide for RPGs because I don&#8217;t like missing extra content (sometimes that stuff is impossible to get without help!). I noticed that there weren&#8217;t any guides at Best Buys or Gamestop, so [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I recently bought <em>Tales of Vesperia</em> for the 360 and wanted to buy a strategy guide. I generally like to get the strategy guide for RPGs because I don&#8217;t like missing extra content (sometimes that stuff is impossible to get without help!). I noticed that there weren&#8217;t any guides at Best Buys or Gamestop, so I went to Amazon and saw:</p>
<p><a href="http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3434/3717778359_1ae074b2dc.jpg?v=0"><img class="alignnone" title="Tales of Vesperia" src="http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3434/3717778359_1ae074b2dc.jpg?v=0" alt="" width="500" height="215" /></a></p>
<p>Holy crap! This game came out not too long ago! I thought strategy guides were supposed to be like 20 bucks. Lame. I started poking around Ebay to see what strategy guides were worth something. First stop: <em>Final Fantasy 7</em>.</p>
<p><a href="http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3499/3718630518_da47ef2304.jpg?v=0"><img class="alignnone" title="Final Fantasy 7" src="http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3499/3718630518_da47ef2304.jpg?v=0" alt="" width="500" height="194" /></a></p>
<p>I know, right? That&#8217;s ridiculously expensive. It is &#8220;Buy It Now&#8221;, so that could mean that nobody will ever buy it, but I didn&#8217;t see any other similar items for a reasonable price. It&#8217;s the only 1st edition copy there too. I think I threw my <em>Final Fantasy 7</em> strategy guide long ago&#8230;</p>
<p>I started searching for strategy guides I knew I still had from back in the day.</p>
<p><a href="http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3456/3718593518_aa7f95e659.jpg?v=0"><img class="alignnone" title="Xenogears" src="http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3456/3718593518_aa7f95e659.jpg?v=0" alt="" width="500" height="193" /></a></p>
<p><a href="http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2444/3717779243_35616a676d.jpg?v=0"><img class="alignnone" title="Earthbound" src="http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2444/3717779243_35616a676d.jpg?v=0" alt="" width="500" height="207" /></a></p>
<p>These are just a few of the guides on Ebay. After spending some time looking through my guides and price checking on ebay, I calculated that I could make about $300. Some of them weren&#8217;t worth anything, but several were worth a lot. Not bad for guides that I don&#8217;t use anymore.</p>
<p>So hold onto those strategy guides and keep them in good condition! You never know what they&#8217;re going to be worth later on.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.raptr.com/2009/07/13/why-you-should-keep-your-strategy-guides/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Making the Offgame Experience Social</title>
		<link>http://blog.raptr.com/2008/03/31/making-the-offgame-experience-social/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.raptr.com/2008/03/31/making-the-offgame-experience-social/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Mar 2008 21:54:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Kevin Cheng</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[About Us]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ponderings]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.raptr.com/?p=5</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A lot of companies out there claim to be a &#8220;social network for gamers&#8221; but what does that mean exactly? For us at Raptr, it means making your offgame experience a lot more fun and social. What is offgame? It&#8217;s when you&#8217;re not actually playing the games you love.
Experiences that happen when you&#8217;re not connected [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A lot of companies out there claim to be a &#8220;social network for gamers&#8221; but what does that mean exactly? For us at Raptr, it means making your off<em>game</em> experience a lot more fun and social. What is offgame? It&#8217;s when you&#8217;re not actually playing the games you love.</p>
<p>Experiences that happen when you&#8217;re not connected to the &#8216;net are called &#8220;offline&#8221;, and let&#8217;s face it, a lot of activities aren&#8217;t as fun when you&#8217;re offline: you don&#8217;t have email, instant messaging, Wikipedia and of course, online gaming. Online, you can talk to your friends, access information and generally communicate and feel a part of a larger whole.</p>
<p>Equally, offgame refers to your experience when you&#8217;re not playing a game: discussing a game on forums, perusing news sites for new screenshots and trailers and maybe drooling over the next big achievement in your game du jour. Ongame, whether it&#8217;s with your friends in your living room, in an online poker table, raiding a dungeon with your guild, or playing Call of Duty 4 against worthy opponents, the experience is engaging, immersive and often social.</p>
<p>This social experience shouldn&#8217;t be limited to the confines of your games. What we aim to accomplish with Raptr is a way for players to continue that experience in the context of common interests. Through Raptr,  people can discuss games they already play and have in common with other players. Even more exciting for us is the prospect of players discovering new games and content through their friends and others on the network.</p>
<p>Raptr is like that friend that understands your musical tastes and recommends to you the next big unsigned bands. Except instead of music, we&#8217;re doing it for all games.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.raptr.com/2008/03/31/making-the-offgame-experience-social/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
